Differential Leveling Project Report

 

Dr. Tobias Sando

CGN3301 Spring 2025

 

Group Leader:

Hugo Guerrero

 

Group Members:

Shakim Brash

Sydni Jordan

Aiden Vance

Table of Contents

 

Introduction. 3

Equipment 3

Sketch of the Site. 5

Calculations. 6

Conclusion. 6

Table of Figures. 7

 


 

Introduction

 

For this project leveling equipment was used to run a closed traverse around a specific area of the UNF campus to better familiarize ourselves with the surveying and leveling processes and procedures. The use of the equipment in real time situations (measuring and calculating BS, HI, FS) allowed us the opportunity for familiarity. Listed will be images of the specific equipment used and a brief description of the use, the points where measurements were taken, and the leveling calculations for each point.

 

Equipment

 

A red and green object on the ground

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 1: Level

 

The microscopic level allowed for the accurate measurement of elevation for our areas of concern. The correct setup is imminent in the accuracy of this equipment.

A close up of a device

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 2: Tripod

 

The tripod is essential to the set-up of the level. The adjustable legs allow for a more level base in the toughest terrains, assisted by metal spikes for a more secure base.

 

A close up of a measuring stick

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 3: Measuring Rod

 

The measuring rod was vital in recording the height of the levels sight (HI), which in turn allowed us to calculate the elevations at certain point (TPi). The rod measured in imperial feet with smaller inch increments.

Sketch of the Site

 

The sketch of the experiment was created in ArcGIS PRO using the layout feature. The purpose of the map is to demonstrate experimental processes in an illustrative manner. This is important because it is easily understandable for someone with little to no experience in differential leveling, or other surveying processes that require a layout. The drawing contains a dotted line going to every point the tripod and level were set up, with different symbology denoting the locations of the benchmark, temporary points, and height of instrument points.

A map of a road

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Calculations

 

Point

BS

HI

FS

Elevation

BM1

3.04 ft

41.95 ft

 

38.91 ft

TP1

5.56 ft

42.43 ft

5.08 ft

36.87 ft

TP2

6.00 ft

43.18 ft

4.96 ft

37.47 ft

TP3

5.71 ft

43.26 ft

5.63 ft

37.55 ft

TP4

4.98 ft

43.03 ft

5.21 ft

38.05 ft

TP5 / BM1

 

 

4.54 ft

38.49 ft

 

The BS, HI, FS, and elevation for each point are shown above. HI and elevation values were found using the following formulas:

 

HI = BS + elevation

Elevation = HI  FS

 

An arithmetic check was used to determine the accuracy of the measurements.



Through the arithmetic check, it was determined that the measurements taken are accurate to a certain degree of error. This is because the difference of the sum of the backsides and frontsides and the change in elevation are within a value of 1 to each other. If there was a greater difference between the two parameters, it's possible there could have been major error in the experimental process.

 

Conclusion

 

While this project was necessary to show how challenging the physical demand of land survey is and the necessary knowledge to do the task, it also allowed a team to work towards one common goal. With everyone's hands on approach and open-mindedness, the task allowed us all to become more familiar with land survey equipment, procedures and the importance of checks and balances. In conclusion, we are grateful for the experience and look forward to learning more.

Table of Figures

 

Figure 1: Level 3

Figure 2: Tripod. 4

Figure 3: Measuring Rod. 4